| When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context‐bound relationship J De Fine Licht, D Naurin, P Esaiasson, M Gilljam Governance 27 (1), 111-134, 2014 | 287 | 2014 |
| Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making: Why explanations are key when trying to produce perceived legitimacy K de Fine Licht, J de Fine Licht AI & society 35, 917-926, 2020 | 199 | 2020 |
| Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: An experiment J de Fine Licht Public administration review 74 (3), 361-371, 2014 | 195 | 2014 |
| Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy J de Fine Licht Scandinavian Political Studies 34 (3), 183-201, 2011 | 175 | 2011 |
| Lights on the shadows of public procurement: Transparency as an antidote to corruption M Bauhr, Á Czibik, J de Fine Licht, M Fazekas Governance 33 (3), 495-523, 2020 | 112 | 2020 |
| Transparency actually: how transparency affects public perceptions of political decision-making J de Fine Licht European political science review 6 (2), 309-330, 2014 | 88 | 2014 |
| How do supreme audit institutions manage their autonomy and impact? A comparative analysis J Pierre, J de Fine Licht Journal of European public policy 26 (2), 226-245, 2019 | 50 | 2019 |
| Is auditing the new evaluation? Can it be? Should it be? J Pierre, BG Peters, J de Fine Licht International Journal of Public Sector Management 31 (6), 726-739, 2018 | 46 | 2018 |
| Does transparency generate legitimacy? An experimental study of procedure acceptance of open-and closed-door decision-making J de Fine Licht, D Naurin, P Esaiasson, M Gilljam | 32 | 2011 |
| Transparency J de Fine Licht, D Naurin Handbook on theories of governance, 226-233, 2022 | 22 | 2022 |
| The role of transparency in auditing J de Fine Licht Financial Accountability & Management 35 (3), 233-245, 2019 | 18 | 2019 |
| Do we really want to know J de Fine Licht The potentially, 2011 | 14 | 2011 |
| “It’s not over when it’s over”―Post-decision arrangements and empirical legitimacy J de Fine Licht, M Agerberg, P Esaiasson Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 32 (1), 183-199, 2022 | 12 | 2022 |
| Open decision-making procedures and public legitimacy J de Fine Licht, D Naurin Secrecy and publicity in votes and debates 131, 2015 | 12 | 2015 |
| Collaborative gaming: When principals and agents agree to game the system J Pierre, J de Fine Licht Public administration 99 (4), 711-722, 2021 | 11 | 2021 |
| Preparing political science students for a non-academic career: Experiences from a novel course module R Broms, J de Fine Licht Politics 39 (4), 514-526, 2019 | 9 | 2019 |
| Magic Wand or Pandoras Box? How transparency in decision making affects public perceptions of legitimacy J de Fine Licht | 9 | 2014 |
| Same Considerations, Different Decisions: Motivations for Split‐Ticket Voting among Swedish Feminist Initiative Supporters S Blombäck, J de Fine Licht Scandinavian Political Studies 40 (1), 61-81, 2017 | 8 | 2017 |
| The Janus face of transparency: Balancing openness and secrecy in democratic decision-making J de Fine Licht Transparency and Secrecy in European Democracies, 17-35, 2020 | 7 | 2020 |
| Priority setting in Swedish health care: are the politicians ready? P Rosén, J De Fine Licht, H Ohlsson Scandinavian journal of public health 42 (3), 227-234, 2014 | 7 | 2014 |
