Follow
Morgan Hazelton
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
The influence of unique information in briefs on Supreme Court opinion content
MLW Hazelton, RK Hinkle, JF Spriggs
Justice System Journal 40 (2), 126-157, 2019
332019
Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making
MLW Hazelton, RK Hinkle
University Press of Kansas, 2022
232022
How interpersonal contact affects appellate review
MJ Nelson, MLW Hazelton, RK Hinkle
The Journal of Politics 84 (1), 573-577, 2022
172022
Sound the alarm? Judicial decisions regarding publication and dissent
M Hazelton, RK Hinkle, JS Jeon
American Politics Research 44 (4), 649-681, 2016
162016
Deferring, deliberating, or dodging review: Explaining counterjudge success in the US courts of appeals
RK Hinkle, MJ Nelson, MLW Hazelton
Journal of Law and Courts 8 (2), 277-300, 2020
152020
Does public financing affect judicial behavior? Evidence from the North Carolina Supreme Court
MLW Hazelton, JM Montgomery, B Nyhan
American Politics Research 44 (4), 587-617, 2016
142016
The elevator effect: Contact and collegiality in the American judiciary
MLW Hazelton, RK Hinkle, MJ Nelson
Oxford University Press, 2023
132023
Panel effects in administrative law: A study of rules, standards, and judicial whistleblowing
M Hazelton, K Hickman, EH Tiller
SMU L. Rev. 71, 445, 2018
132018
What political science can contribute to the study of law
AD Martin, MLW Hazelton
Review of Law & Economics 8 (2), 511-529, 2012
132012
The elevator effect: How collegiality impacts dissent
MLW Hazelton, RK Hinkle, MJ Nelson
Unpublished Manuscript. http://mjnelson. org/papers/HHN. Elevator. Effect. pdf, 2017
112017
The Long and the Short of It: The Influence of Briefs on Outcomes in the Roberts Courts
MLW Hazelton, RK Hinkle, JF Spriggs
Wash. UJL & Pol'y 54, 123, 2017
112017
Judicial Impact and Factual Allegations: How the Supreme Court Changed Civil Procedure through the Plausibility Standard
MLW Hazelton
Journal of Law and Courts 9 (1), 159-188, 2021
102021
Procedural Postures: The Influence of Legal Change on Strategic Litigants and Judges
MLW Hazelton
Washington University in St. Louis, 2014
32014
Seeing the Supreme Court as a Whole Institution: Law and Social Science
MLW Hazelton
. Louis ULJ 67, 615, 2022
22022
Quit Your Complaining? Considering the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Strategic Litigants
MLW Hazelton
Unpublished working paper, 2015
22015
Estimating the E⬚ ffect of Contributions on Judicial Decision-Making: Evidence from the North Carolina Supreme Court
MLW Hazelton, JM Montgomery, B Nyhan
Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 2013
22013
Does Analogical Reasoning Constrain the US Supreme Court
M Hazelton, R Hinkle, JF Spriggs II
22011
On replication and the study of the Louisiana Supreme Court
MLW Hazelton, RK Hinkle, AD Martin
22010
Using tf-idf and Cosine Similarity to Compare Legal Texts
MLW Hazelton
LAW & COURTS NEWSLETTER, 19, 0
1
Law, text, and judicial politics
MLW Hazelton
Research Handbook on Judicial Politics, 436-449, 2024
2024
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20